HomeОбразованиеRelated VideosMore From: City Beautiful

Will sea level rise drown our coastal cities?

1146 ratings | 33033 views
Sea level rise viewer (U.S. only, sorry international plan fans): https://coast.noaa.gov/slr/ Sea level rise could submerge land currently home to up to 760 million people worldwide if global temperatures rise 4 degrees celsius by the year 2100. So what are cities and city planners going to do to minimize the potential devastation? Resources on this topic: Brecht, H., Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Murray, S., & Wheeler, D. (2012). Sea-Level Rise and Storm Surges: High Stakes for a Small Number of Developing Countries. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(1), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496511433601 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi= "Climate change crusade goes local" By Doug Struck https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/0809/Climate-change-crusade-goes-local Hauer, M. E., Evans, J. M., & Mishra, D. R. (2016). Millions projected to be at risk from sea-level rise in the continental United States. Nature Climate Change, 6(7), 691–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2961 "9 Popular Cities Losing War with Rising Seas" https://www.seeker.com/9-popular-cities-losing-war-with-rising-seas-1767623708.html "Shanghai Struggles to Save Itself From the Sea" by Coco Liu http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2011/09/27/27climatewire-shanghai-struggles-to-save-itself-from-the-s-43368.html?pagewanted=all "From Miami to Shanghai: 3C of warming will leave world cities below sea level" by Jonathan Watts https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/nov/03/miami-shanghai-3c-warming-cities-underwater "The three-degree world: the cities that will be drowned by global warming" by Josh Holder, Niko Kommenda, and Jonathan Watts https://www.theguardian.com/cities/ng-interactive/2017/nov/03/three-degree-world-cities-drowned-global-warming "Mapping Choices: Carbon, Climate, and Rising Seas, Our Global Legacy" by Climate Central http://sealevel.climatecentral.org/uploads/research/Global-Mapping-Choices-Report.pdf "The Rise of Resilience: Linking Resilience and Sustainability in City Planning" by Timon McPhearson https://static1.squarespace.com/static/552ec5f5e4b07754ed72c4d2/t/5550a70ae4b0134fb5a0bcf6/1431349002346/mcphearson+2014c_the+nature+of+cities.pdf "Shanghai takes measures against rising sea levels" https://gbtimes.com/shanghai-takes-measures-against-rising-sea-levels Photo sources: - Wikimedia Commons Produced in sunny Sacramento, California.
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (226)
City Beautiful (1 year ago)
Happy holidays everyone! Thanks for a great year!
Malav Bhatt (1 year ago)
City Beautiful That was some great content sir. I can only imagine how much time it took you to gather the info. I did a brief on it and I had to give a whole day skimming through reports and papers to get the right words. And that's just something on paper. Visuals is another thing. Can we interact on some related matters in some way?
Abraham Lincoln (1 year ago)
>Immediate science denial from the get-go. Sorry, but CO2 sticks to low-atmosphere, and doesn't get high enough to warm the atmosphere below 12% concentration.
Jeffry Anderson (3 days ago)
He always pronounces subsidence like it’s a brand new vocabulary word.
oso1248 (27 days ago)
Hopefully it does. And yes, my house is perfectly safe. And no, you are not welcome here.
Star Catcher (1 month ago)
We just need to give up our meat habit. Www.cowspiracy.com
だいOtaku (1 month ago)
I like your videos.
SEM LLC (2 months ago)
2100 lol
Tucker Gardner (2 months ago)
The Paris Agreement isn't a binding treaty and has no means of enforcement. The US has reduced it's emissions more than any other individual country, as much as the EU has in it's entirety, and we've done it without Paris. Under The Paris Agreement China, already the single biggest contributor to global Co2 emissions, pledged to stop INCREASING their emissions by 2030. MIT concluded that the Paris Agreement would cause the global temperature to decrease by about 0.6 to 1.1 degrees Celsius by 2100, with only a 0.1 C change by 2050. No one really disputes that humans can and do effect the climate, what people dispute is how to most efficiently mitigate the damage. I suggest that if you don't like coal, oil, or natural gas then you should advocate for nuclear power, which actually pollutes less then solar and wind when you take into account the heavy metals used in their production and the lifespan of the systems. If the word "Nuclear" scares you, please educate yourself more thoroughly on the subject.
darek4488 (2 months ago)
Think about how much air pollution will just disappear if all these coastal cities just sink.
activetruman (2 months ago)
The water's not gonna rise 15 feet overnight yall need to chill out
Sarah Andrea Royce (2 months ago)
Cities also won't move overnight, so better not chill out and act now.
Valentin Roesler (2 months ago)
bUt ClImAtE cHaNgE iSn'T rEaL!¡!¡
H Eck (3 months ago)
I've lived next the ocean for 38 years and the water levels have been the same. So far climate change doesn't seem legit .
Peter Breedveld (3 months ago)
These coastal cities with very valuable land rebuild themselves every 50 years or so. Just build the new buildings higher up either by moving dirt or putting them on big stilts and make them better able to withstand storms. As for the less valuable but vulnerable land just buy it out and have the people move. Cutting CO2 ain't going to happen unless we invent a new carbon free or carbon light source of fuel (not just energy) that doesn't cost more, and is as easy to store as fossil fuels. Currently fossil fuel is just too useful and valuable to leave in the ground.
Sarah L (5 months ago)
Hi City Beautiful. You'd enjoy this video about competing visions of Staten Island's post-industrial North Shore, from the city's and developer's vision of it as a place for giant private high rises that will block the view and connection of the public to the bay, to a vision of it as a place for athletic fields, maritime education complexes, and park amenities that will invite more people to connect near the water's edge, without increasing the risk to lives and property on the waterfront. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYzVOofueL0
banana junior 9000 (5 months ago)
Global Warming is a conspiracy invented by the Chinese to appease the Cloud People and 7/11 was a part-time job. Just kidding, learn how to swim and brace for impact.
Seta-San (5 months ago)
God, I hope.
CloudyDaze007 (5 months ago)
Most oxygen produced is not by land plants. above 70% of air is made by Marine plants like Seaweed, Seagrass, Kelp, Algea and Plankton!!! If we prepared these nearly above sea level lands or already under, for Green Sea farms, we'd bring our CO² down and Oxygen up. Benefits, more oxygen, bigger creatures. monster size human race.
NorthTrEndz_CLE (5 months ago)
The great lakes also have coastal cities
Nico Avellana (5 months ago)
God I hope so. That is what liberals get for inventing global warming.
Nico Avellana (5 months ago)
Liberals invented global warming to get us to switch to vegan diets. So they are responsible for all these natural disasters. We would not be recycling and saving if liberals just kept the earth as it is.
kennys Boat (5 months ago)
what? what do you mean?
T.A.Z.E. Studios (5 months ago)
No mention of New Orleans?
Umberto Fournier (5 months ago)
crucial choices need to be made
hepan (6 months ago)
Whenever I see Venice I see the Canals map from CSGO.
Dion Dais (6 months ago)
4:36 Melbourne 109 Tram!!
Matt J (6 months ago)
Its funny how the dates when all this is going to happen keeps moving farther back. Originally all this should have happened by now when they first started spreading these lies. Then that date comes and goes and they just start claiming it will happen even farther in the future. Meanwhile nobody ever talks about how the data was heavily exaggerated to make climate change look real.
Techy (6 months ago)
Yes, depending on how high those Costal Cities are they might get flooded. I mean you could always build a city in a way that if Sea Level rises further the bits would just start Floating on the water instead but who would even dare to think that far am i right?
Nathan Bruce (6 months ago)
Great content
FatheredPuma81 (6 months ago)
Your "job" isn't to talk about politics you know very little about. It's to talk about what the video is about. At least it was a very quick brush by on it.
Devin Hallsworth (6 months ago)
Take a look at a topographic height map of new Orleans. The whole city is built in a bowl with the top edge of the bowl right on the gulf and actually lower than sea level. If ANY PLACE is going to get destroyed by sea level rise first its going to be new Orleans.  If youre not in new Orleans and new Orleans is still around I wouldn't ever start to worry yet about sea level rise.
Hoystein (6 months ago)
Venice should raise the city farther up on it's foundations honestly. There will always be the risk of there means to hold back the tide failing. like this little city you might know called New Orleans. They also trust in holding back the sea. But they learned that they are better off with bringing up the foundations and making it so they are above water normally. Venice did this in the first place. It is better to work with nature to solve a issue then fight it. Venice should raise by two meters so as to avoid making the same costly mistake as New Orleans did. Stopgaps are not something to be leaned on.
Gammareign (7 months ago)
If ecofascists hadn't fought nuclear power and hydropower, this wouldn't be as much of a problem. Carbon dioxide also "causes" photosynthesis and plant sugar. Yes, carbon dioxide is plant food.
Jose Angel Monterroza (5 months ago)
OMG really? well then lets pump as much carbon dioxide as we can into the air!, we're just feeding plants.... And let's also deforestate millions of square kilometers yo build stuff wich produces more carbon dioxide!!! yes that's a great idea!!!
Analytic31 (6 months ago)
Gammareign Agreed with that first part. Nuclear power at a glance seems to be a perfect temporary solution to completely eliminate carbon emissions from electricity. Plants can only absorb so much CO2, though. We are pumping more of it than plants can take in. NASA actually made a video demonstrating this. Here it is: https://youtu.be/x1SgmFa0r04
Nah we'll solve it
Mystery Man (8 months ago)
I’m excited for Arizona’s beach
iron 13 (8 months ago)
We're humans, we adapt nature to our needs.
Rynier Yarom (9 months ago)
I thought Sandy class devastation is the norm now? Like every year for the US, last year Texas storm, the year before New York storm
YaboiMuggy (9 months ago)
problem with the Paris accords were that it was full of empty promises, or promising under what the countries had already planned to reduce, except the US.
Patrick W (9 months ago)
could not find the link about finding out if you home was at risk
Mochamad Fachri (9 months ago)
Some have said that another thing that exacerbates the effect of sea level rise is land subsidence. You have mentioned about that in the video, but in some areas with underlying clay soils, subsidence can play a larger factor. Most of Tokyo's bay area is now undersea, not due to the sea level rising, but due to subsidence. So another way to prevent being drown by the sea is by stopping subsidence, usually by stopping groundwater pumping. Though then we'd still need to deal with the sea level rise itself again, albeit that happens at a somewhat "slower" rate.
kokofan50 (9 months ago)
Nuclear power plants have shown to be some of the most resilient power sources we have. During Harvy, the nuclear plant down in Huston was supplying power to critical infrastructure like hospitals while the other plants were shut down. Even the reactor failure at the Daiichi plant in Fukushima could have easily been prevented by leaving the reactors on so them could power their cooling systems.
kennys Boat (5 months ago)
its not used in place of coal due to the fact the 1% wants to make more money then they need/have.
Analytic31 (6 months ago)
kokofan50 If Nuclear power is so great, then why isn't it utilized far more than every other source? If Nuclear Power provided most of the world's power, CO2 emissions from electricity would be almost non-existent. You would think it's the perfect transitional power source, unlike the pathetic, unscalable garbage that is wind and solar power.
Phil Rabe (9 months ago)
For SF bay, we'll 'just' dam the Golden Gate. Put in enormous shipping locks and pumps to expel the river inflow and maintain the bay's salinity. At around 1.5 meters rise, the whole central valley would be prone to Pacific flooding.
sirnik84 (9 months ago)
I just found your channel and I'm enjoying your videos. I found this video interesting as I'm an engineer and I'm from a family of engineers. One of our vacations when I was a child was to Houston, Texas we hit the usual places like the Johnson Space Center, but we also drove out of our way to go see Galveston and their sea wall. I live in Sacramento now and I find all the flood control in our city very interesting. I took a machine shop class when I was in college at Sierra College and the instructor was a machinist who worked for the City of Sacramento. His day job was to machine parts for the city's pump system. Some of their pump are so old you can not buy replacement parts, they are built as needed in the city's machine shop. I work in the water and waste water industry and we do storm water pump stations. I would love to know more about what different cities have done to combat flooding. Maybe a few more videos could be made on this topic. Cheers on a great video I found it fascinating.
City Beautiful (9 months ago)
Thanks! I live in Sacramento too, and if I do a video about the city, it will probably revolve around flood issues.
Thomas Christensen (9 months ago)
Love the lowkey shade at 0:57 lmao "overwhelming data"
Daniel Rhone (10 months ago)
New Orleans comes to mind too cause that City is below sea level. They were once flooded out by Hurricane Katrina
Brad the Pitts (10 months ago)
I'm still waiting for the Y2K disaster.
Mystic System (6 months ago)
what about the 2038 problem
Analytic31 (6 months ago)
Sir Eddie That's completely different, and related to computers, not the global climate. Y2K was also real, but heavily exaggerated, a bit like Climate change/global warming is now. Unlike climate change however, Y2K was properly addressed by software developers and the like. No disaster happened partly because *people actually did something about it.*
So your saying by the time I am dead the sea level will rise by 1 to 2 meters? Yeah. Fuck that. Lets destroy our entire economies and plunge the world into poverty. Great plan. Additionally, the great lakes are expected to DECREASE in sea level by 2.5 meters over the next 100 years. Why? Because as the temperature warms evaporation INCREASES. Most models predict that evaporation will increase faster than precipitation on the great lakes. Furthermore, the great lakes are cut off from ocean sea level rise by the International Joint Commission P.S. I am a farmer who lives 10 miles away from the great lakes and 1,250 feet above sea level. I hope your cities drown.
City Beautiful (11 months ago)
I posted links to journal articles and news reports in the video description. I guess I'm somewhat skeptical that anything would change your mind as your first comment makes me think you have pretty strong beliefs around this issue ("I hope your cities drown, etc.")
you actually respond to comments? I have massive respect for you. I don't mind global warming but I am not convinced that is catastrophic and preventable. If you link a scientific blog/report that supports your position I would wade through it.
City Beautiful (11 months ago)
I'm actually born and raised 10 miles from the Great Lakes too. My dad works in agriculture. Not sure why you have have to be so antagonistic. Sounds like you don't want global warming either -- we don't want to lose fresh water in the Great Lakes.
Jeeto (11 months ago)
3:45 is Hong Kong though, not Shanghai
TheDankMemelord (11 months ago)
What could be done to solve this issue is to not build more infrastructure near coasts. Instead, build it in an area that won't be affected by sea level rise.
kokofan50 (9 months ago)
Yes, we can just build sea ports inland away from the water.
koji kabuto (1 year ago)
Global warming, sorry, Climate change now, is nonsense. To predict weather patterns at a global scale is absurd.
Analytic31 (6 months ago)
koji kabuto Yes, predicting something like that on a global scale is slightly absurd. That is why nobody knows what exactly will happen, but knows approximately what could happen. People have done a poor job at naming the phenomenon. It's real though, and you might be witnessing the effects of it on a daily basis, depending on where you live.
kokofan50 (9 months ago)
It’s not weather; it’s climate. The climate is the average of weather over time. While figuring out what’s going to happen on any given day is difficult, knowing what the average of an area isn’t that hard.
robox91 (1 year ago)
How do you know how long the dykes are in the Netherlands? Nobody knows that, we are building them for centuries.
Harrison Batzloff (1 year ago)
Venice is real-life Atlantis?
Michael Williams (1 year ago)
100 years, ok.
Marcus Mercer (1 year ago)
This is insane. We need just prohibit to sell gasoline private cars. That's all. As a result, we will get normal sea level and moreover clean air to breath.
Gammareign (7 months ago)
Plants absorb CO2 for free.
Marcus Mercer (1 year ago)
+Frank Such a reasonable comment! Thank you for that. But if we will prohibit to sell gasoline private cars, at least we will get fresh air to breath without air purifiers. Now it's impossible in half of Europe, many cities in USA and in Asia (China, India etc.).
Frankbrooo (1 year ago)
Marcus Mercer It’s pretty much to late. We could completely switch to renewables and electric cars tomorrow we’d still be screwed. Climate change is a snowball rolling down a hill. It’s already to the point where the amount of energy we need to turn it around is gone. We’d have to develop a way to suck CO2 out of the atmosphere efficiently then on top of that make it economical. There is no such way. At this point we need to look into abandoning these areas and moving people into areas that won’t flood or else we’re going to lose trillions of dollars in flooding and many lives.
Cadet Tau (1 year ago)
This just adds fuel to my dystopian view of Miami, in which the lower class who service the rich in their high rises will be living on floating favelas on the bay. People think I'm crazy when I mention this to them until I breakdown the my logic. That's when the look of despair encroaches onto their faces as this stark realization begins flood their minds. Sorry for the puns :P Great vid!
Richard Wallace (1 year ago)
Best way to save your house from sea level rise: Dont have one, be a hobo :D
Sam Jensen (1 year ago)
Hey can you do a video on gentrification?
City Beautiful (1 year ago)
That's a great idea and it's definitely on my list for the future.
sparkshinx (1 year ago)
Hey Dave! Would love to see a video on Monorail. Why is light rail preferred over monorails when monorails are less obtrusive, easier to install and generally safer?
EclipseMT (9 months ago)
nlpnt I've seen too many arguments regarding this debate over light rail or monorail discount another similar form of transportation: the automated guideway transit (or automated people mover, depending on whose terminology you prefer). Why, except in Japan (where AGT was adapted as a lower-cost alternative to a full-scale subway in certain scenarios, namely the Ina Line in Saitama and the Nippori-Toneri Liner), are these systems confined to airports, when they have lower up-front and running costs?
nlpnt (1 year ago)
Don't monorails basically have to be elevated? Bus rapid transit is generally the cheapest way to get service up and running. But there are cultural issues around both - "monorails are toys for tourists, buses are for people who can't afford cars" sums it up. Light rail is a compromise - it can (usually) run on a mix of existing and new infrastructure, and it's "for people who live here" without being "(only) for the poors".
City Beautiful (1 year ago)
It'll be coming up in a few months!
Easton Hill (1 year ago)
I'm an Real-Estate investor in Houston Tx and let me tell you, this video would have helped a lot pre-flood!
Rupert Hetherton (1 year ago)
👀 Melbourne tram photo #resilience
Andre Tsang (1 year ago)
Why should the government pay to rebuild houses built on flood plains? It’s not like you don’t know it’s a floodplain before buying there.
G+1121494 (6 months ago)
Also, home owners in the US can freely enjoy building in flood areas without any own financial damages for repairs, as those are socialised into a plain stupid public insurance programm. Insurances are supposed to be for risks you want to avoid. This programm alleviates not risks but socialises certainties.
simon wang (9 months ago)
Because simply letting millions of people's houses go under water creates wide ranging social harms for everyone.
Michael King (1 year ago)
I hope so
Mr. Beat (1 year ago)
Watching this "safely" in Kansas.
Sheast z (17 hours ago)
watching this 3000m above sea level!
david kowalkowski (3 months ago)
except for tornados
Steven Harrison (5 months ago)
I’d rather drown near the coasts than live in Kansas.
simon wang (9 months ago)
But then you have fracking earthquakes.
Tad Blackington (9 months ago)
Of course you might end up living in the great American sand sea. Even if not that you could end up with lots of new neighbors from New York and Los Angeles.
Steven (1 year ago)
Work on your camera level rise! The top of your head is cut off during the intro and outro. Zoom out a bit and research basic camera composition. Great channel!
Love your videos but one question. The Netherlands lines up 350 miles of Dikes to cure their Flooding issues... how is 350 miles of Carpet Munchers going to take care of High Water???
Michael Nowik (1 year ago)
DeyTryToCatchMe TrollinDirty maybe they can "lick" the water if you know what i mean😉
K M (1 year ago)
Of course the Climate Change deniers don't care if sea levels rise, most of their political opponents live on the coast whilst their political allies live in the hinterland.
Hannodb1961 (1 year ago)
South African here. Gauteng province is 2km above sea level. We should be safe.
Demonta Barrino (8 months ago)
Hannodb1961 What about Cape Town?
Ja-Shwa Cardell (1 year ago)
how will "sea" level rise effect Chicago? Chicago is often framed as impervious to sea level rise, but lakes are still water, and thus will be affected by thermal expansion, so what will be the effect?
Hart Poole (6 months ago)
Gammareigh, Water expands as it warms above 4 degrees Celsius. Below 4 degrees it expands slightly as it cools, and expands about 10% as it freezes.
Zachary Taylor (6 months ago)
Chicago may sit on a lake, but the altitude of that lake's surface level, isn't at Sea Level. You've heard of Niagara Falls? Lake Michigan and the 3 other "upper" Great Lakes drain into the Niagara River, which then falls off the Niagara Escarpment creating Niagara Falls, which then drains into the lowest lake, Lake Ontario, which drains into the Sea via the St. Lawrence River. For Sea Level rise to affect Chicago, the rising seas would first have to submerge Niagara Falls, which doesn't look likely even with the most severe predictions.
Gammareign (7 months ago)
Water contracts as it warms, unless it is heated to steam. It actually, expands when it turns to ice. That's why roads and sidewalks crack during the winter because water under them freezes to ice and expands. It's the same reason pipes rupture during Winter.
ItsZachTV (8 months ago)
I feel like investing in Chicago property will be a great idea. As others have said, it won't be affected by the sea level rise. It's economy will continue to thrive while other major US coastal cities struggle to stay afloat both literally and economically.
TheDankMemelord (9 months ago)
My area does have issues with heavy rain, all the nearby fields flood and all the ditches and creeks overflow very quickly. One of the main problems in my town is that a bridge that spans over the creek that runs adjacent to my house wasn't built properly, and after it rains, there's always about a foot or two of standing water.
Ian Pineda (1 year ago)
Mexico city LOL :)
Derpster (1 year ago)
I hope my city will build huge schnorkel.
City Beautiful (1 year ago)
Points for creativity!
sacamigo1 (1 year ago)
you were in SF? what did you think of our new Salesforce tower?
sacamigo1 (1 year ago)
Oh cool I imagined you a Deverite. I'll keep a slightly-stalkerish eye out for you. Its a small Bay
City Beautiful (1 year ago)
I go to school in the Bay Area so I see the SF skyline all the time. Still getting used to having a new tallest building.
Brian Plank (1 year ago)
Wait wait wait, you're telling me that building a wall is the answer to a unstoppable flow of unwanted matter?.... That sounds racist to me. Oh, and good thing we pulled out of the Climate Accord. It was just a massive wealth redistribution scheme.
Malle Pietje (2 months ago)
The Netherlands has built a great, great wall to protect us from all the water from Mexico.
Adam Smith (1 year ago)
Brian Plank The entire idea of anthropogenic climate change is a giant wealth redistribution scheme
Cheeseburgers Arecool (1 year ago)
Global warming is a hoax
kennys Boat (5 months ago)
tell that to the thermometer
Tad Blackington (11 months ago)
Cheeseburgers Arecool Tell that to the water.
scose (1 year ago)
what is the city at 3:45?
City Beautiful (1 year ago)
Yep its Hong Kong.
Feynstein 100 (1 year ago)
No climate change skeptics? Hmm I must be early.
Michael Williams (1 year ago)
The comment was about the US and China.
ganymedeIV4 (1 year ago)
Ha, they're here now brietbart parroting and laying down the best whataboutisms they can think of in a moments notice.
Feynstein 100 (1 year ago)
Darckense Onoda (1 year ago)
There are, also saw a kid who claimed that the USA barely pollutes compared to India. It'd be funny if it weren't so insane.
jmuld1 (1 year ago)
Sea level change by NOAA tide gauges show no rate change from pre/post mans co2, simple basic calculation
jmuld1 (1 year ago)
Gany; You got it the tide gauges are a nice simple instrument, manned by countless well meaning people not subject to group think, but you miss what they do, only h2o.
ganymedeIV4 (1 year ago)
NOAA's tide gauges don't sample carbonoxides, they measure the height of the water column in that particular zone via a modulated torque rheostat hooked to a cable thats anchored to the ocean floor, it's a mechanism most teenagers could build with a little knowledge... and that's all the T.R.E.O.S unit does. NOAA's tidal gauges have only existed since 1988, so even if they did some how sample Co2 then there would only be 30 years of data while the industrial revolution and human desequestration of carbon oxides has been occurring throughout the world for several centuries.
The Abyss (1 year ago)
I've been waiting for this one, video turned out great Dave!
robertsd247 (1 year ago)
I wouldn't mind seeing some (cough cough...) liberal cities going underwater. Great video!
kennys Boat (5 months ago)
yep if they go under water they request help (100B$) and we give (regrettably) to them then when we need help they dont give (not paying taxes stating they are to high and we need to fund the military more).
simon wang (6 months ago)
hebneh Houston is a very liberal city
Sudhir Raghu (6 months ago)
Well most of the world's greatest cities are *cough cough* liberal..so it'll be a tragedy if that day comes. Also, your laissez faire conservatism won't look so good when your economy doesn't have the money these cities generate.
hebneh (7 months ago)
In 2017, a decidedly non-liberal city in a non-liberal state (cough cough...Houston, Texas) went substantially underwater. So when it happens to liberals it's OK, but to conservatives it's a disaster?
simon wang (9 months ago)
What's a non liberal city? Living in close proximity together in a city tends to make people liberal.
Lucas Fernandez (1 year ago)
Be mad at China for pollution not the U.S. We barely pollute that much for the 5th largest country in the world and for the most industrialized
sasquatch 747 (5 months ago)
kennys Boat that’s the government not the people you racist jerk
kennys Boat (5 months ago)
sasquatch 747 how by pulling out of an anti climate change act? that sure sounds like trying! and cutting almost all spending on EPA?
kennys Boat (5 months ago)
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+cars+are+in+the+us&rlz=1C1CHZL_enUS753US753&oq=how+many+cars+are+in&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j0l5.8232j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 there is 275 million cars in the u.s https://www.activesustainability.com/environment/top-5-most-polluting-countries/ the u.s accounts for 15% of all pollution is created by the U.S and china double that 30% the U.S accounts for a large portion of pollution your claim is not necessarily true.
sasquatch 747 (5 months ago)
Rhys P the us is trying
Desmond (6 months ago)
You also have to consider that fact that everyone has pushed their manufacturing to China, yet we're blaming them.
MarloSoBalJr (1 year ago)
I'm glad most parts Baltimore, Maryland are on high ground with a scenic waterfront view.
CzarJuliusIII (5 months ago)
Most of the Mid-Atlantic Region is in danger of going underwater, even the areas that are far from the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware River, and Potomac River.
Daniel Rhone (10 months ago)
I hope the National Aquarium in Baltimore doesn’t get infected by the sea level rise in the next century
DAK4Blizzard (1 year ago)
True, but the Inner Harbor is vulnerable to a rise of 2-3 meters (6-10 feet). In addition, a lot of Maryland's coastline along the lower Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean will be inundated by just a couple feet of sea level rise. http://maps.risingsea.net/Maryland.html An exacerbating problem for Maryland is that land to the north is still rising in response to the ice sheet that vanished millennia ago after the last ice age. This will cause Maryland to sink by an additional several inches over the course of the 21st century. Thus, even conservative projections have Maryland experiencing a foot of sea level rise by mid century (2040 or 2050), with respect to the year 2000.
Patriotis (1 year ago)
414 light street was built a few feet above ground
Salvadiggity (1 year ago)
I am genuinely hurt that you only have 24k subs. You should be a national treasure.
RamsesTheFourth (5 months ago)
they are rising 3mm per year
Cory Carlson (8 months ago)
why for spreading b.s. fear? seas havent rose a mm.
bmad48 (1 year ago)
This really isn't being talked about enough!
Khan Piesse (2 months ago)
+Cory Carlson do you enjoy being that blatantly stupid or do you have some sort of fetish for destroying the environment
Cory Carlson (8 months ago)
because its fake.
JC Mik (1 year ago)
T̅͜H̰̫̫͙ͥ͋E̲̦͉̼̳̽ͣ͛̊ͦͫ ̱̝͎̯̙͌̃C̶̗̝̞̗̗̻̞̉͐̂ͬ̒̈́I̘͚̖̻͙ͬT͍̹̮̂̍͌͂͐ͅI̟̳̹͝E͖̞ͦ̊̉ͫͧ̅͂S͊͊̐̈́͐̚͏͈͚̹ ̵͚̝̫̲̳̝̦̾͊DR̡̪̦̯͚̜̜͗ͣ͑͋̍ͅO̟̹̩̤͛W͈͙͕͍͖͉͌̑̒͋̌̊̚N̬͖̬̞̪̄͐ ̨͓̝ͪͧ͌̽ͪ́̇T̟̃̏ͨ̈̽̈́H̰͓̥͒ͪ͗ͩ͊̌ͅĒͅ ͔̬͍͕̭͈͗̓̑͆ͦ̍C͍̬̈̅̓̾ͭY̵̝̓C̰ͧͪ́̎ͅL̜È̶̥͉̩̯̟͙̘ ̷̹̜͔͕̤̯͋͋͑B̰̙̤̤̠̰̾́E͓̟̪̊̄̏ͬ͒ͣ̒G̣̥͕̙̺I̴̖͎͖̺̺͐̍̐ͪ͊N̡͍̠͚̻Ŝ͇̯̗̰̀͋̊ͯͧ̅ ͐A̞̣͎̲͆͢N̗ͨ́E͙ͦ̄̉ͫ̉Wͥͦ̅͗ͦ
The Narwhal (1 year ago)
Hello Have a good day!!
Blue06LT (1 year ago)
Although the US spews a ton of pollution, the main issue with world climate change is China. The Chinese don't give a flying poo about spewing emissions into the atmosphere and it affects the entire planet. The US withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement is bad, there's no question. However controlling what China puts into the air is what really needs to be done so they don't kill us all.
Alpa Deepak Shah (5 months ago)
+Owen Major US is one of, if not the most developed country in the world and this is all because of the cheap energy it has. This has caused a lot of pollution. The developing countries also need cheap energy to develop. This is why, like US, other countries are using sources like coal and petroleum. But the major change now is that the developing countries are investing a lot in renewable energy sources. It should be US who should actually encourage other counties to go green and help other countries too. Not that US doesnt have any problems, but it is better to save the planet before saving only US as if the planet is doomed, well then US is doomed too
Devin Hallsworth (6 months ago)
Americas actually beat all the other Paris accord countries in 2017 for reducing carbon emmisions.
Cory Carlson (8 months ago)
blue06lt so someone who drives a truck for work wont be able to make a living? i drive 100-300 miles a day and need a truck for tools supplies and ladders. im an independent contractor and everything is out of pocket. no way a pissant electric vehicle could do my job. esp. if you are in texas country miles from anywhere.
Cory Carlson (8 months ago)
for only $15 trillion al gore said he can fix the world! sounds like a bargin!
Mochamad Fachri (9 months ago)
China has started research into 'green' techs. Once they progress through though, they'd swamp put most western efforts. So hold your high horses and start pacing it I say.
Nicolas Medina (1 year ago)
We need the Dutch.
oso1248 (27 days ago)
No one is necessary.
Daniël van Deutekom (5 months ago)
And yes, we've been astonishing at the lack of flood prevention in New Orleans, Houston and NY. The costs of building a decent dike or artificial dune are wayyy lower than the costs of rebuilding the city (or parts of it) after a flood, let alone after multiple floods. It's just weird... The recent flood in Houston cost about 20 billion dollars. We could have installed a proper dune or dike for probably 1/4th of that.
Daniël van Deutekom (5 months ago)
Here I am! 😜
Frankbrooo (1 year ago)
It’s sad that it’s come to this, but you’re correct. Call in the Netherlands
FutureNow (1 year ago)
Great video, as always! Love the motion graphics. I used to live in Miami and now live near the shore in the Boston area so I think I'm screwed either way.
Rahim Joseph (1 year ago)
dale stewart (1 year ago)
The Paris accords wouldn't have done anything thats why we left, the us is already working to reduce carbon change, it's China and India who need to chill
kennys Boat (5 months ago)
LegendMeadow if someone asks for a source then you must provide it to be credible! that means no source = thin air also if someone dismisses it its likely from some nonsense website or book like fox news or some other media try wikipedia and look in there sources to find credible things!
kennys Boat (5 months ago)
that's not true at all the media likes to make it look like or seem like we do enough to control pollution but that is not the case the paris accord would have put in place controls and measures to reduce pollution and environmental destruction! get your facts straight! https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+cars+are+in+the+us&rlz=1C1CHZL_enUS753US753&oq=how+many+cars+are+in&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j0l5.8232j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 there is 275 million cars in the u.s https://www.activesustainability.com/environment/top-5-most-polluting-countries/ the u.s accounts for 15% of all pollution is created by the U.S and china double that 30% the U.S accounts for a large portion of pollution your claim is not necessarily true.
LegendMeadow (1 year ago)
I think I should also mention that I do believe that climate change is an existent threat. I recognize that there are periods of warmer and cooler temperatures. My skepticism comes with the hypothesis that this climate change is man-made. I believe that to be a fallacy, because we didn't start to see heating and cooling periods only after the industrial revolution. We obviously had ice ages and great floods throughout all the periods of time before that. I do not think there really is any way we can 'solve' this issue. But I do think that we have to stop diverting so many of our resources to climate change prevention, because we have many issues aside from that particular one. Also, if we waste trillions of dollars on ineffective climate change prevention programs, we'll be left with no capital to save ourselves from for example floods, extreme weather, extreme temperatures etc... that could be caused by this climate change. I think if there is one climate issue we need to address it is the issue of how much we're destroying our planet directly. With all the stress of farmlands, the local pollution that we see in places like China and India, the depletion of our resources. Those things I believe have to be solved, and they can be solved in a variety of ways. I won't mention them right now.
James Tucker (1 year ago)
it's a good theory and I think proven throughout history. I do think human nature will perpetually favor the majority opinion, but isn't that what democracy is about?  I do think he has some good points and climate change has to be dealt with in a long term way, as he proposes. However, global accords are not only a set of protocols, they're good way to send a message to other countries that the US is standing for something that many countries are worried about, hence putting the US in a good position for leverage in other areas that we would like change. And yes, this would cost many trillions of dollars globally as you mentioned but we are also striving to put people to work in a sustainable workforce. Could creating jobs to help deflect not only climate change but the sea level rise associated with it be a long term solution?
LegendMeadow (1 year ago)
At one time slavery was the status quo. Does that make slavery right? Just because an opinion is held by just a few people out of the many doesn't mean that that opinion is wrong. Most scientists who are considered 'qualified' to say if climate change is right or wrong are in favor of man-made climate change. Don't you think that has anything to do with them wanting to not get fired, or wanting to get funding? Humans respond to incentives. Governments generally support man-made climate change as a fact. The reason for that most likely has to do with all the tax revenues they can gather from carbon taxes and such. Anyway, that's just my theory.
fordtify (1 year ago)
just wrote a paper on this!
oa ni (1 year ago)
fordtify you should put the link around here
oa ni (1 year ago)
Rahim Joseph (1 year ago)
Omar Adrián Nuño Íñiguez second
Mirza Ahmed (1 year ago)
Omar Adrián Nuño Íñiguez No.
Sergio Calderon (1 year ago)
0:52 i think he is referencing Canada, guys...
YaboiMuggy (9 months ago)
not to mention that everyone else's agreements were very vague or even said they planned to increase carbon emissions
Jeeto (11 months ago)
But we're still on track to meet and exceed all the things agreed to in the Paris Accords, just without having to send delegates and spend money on all the red tape.
Henry Dery MacNeil (1 year ago)
r u joking! Its the USA

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.